A recent issue of American Heritage, a magazine devoted to analyzing important cultural issues in U.S. history, contains an article that provides ample clues to the true nature of the late 19th century period in the United States. The piece, “People Of Progress,” features the greatest innovators of the 20th century, and takes as its point of departure Christian Schussele’s famed 1862 painting, Men of Progress, a depiction of 19 great American inventors and creative thinkers of the first half of the 19th century. Schussele’s painting portrays such men as Cyrus McCormick (1809-1884), the inventor and manufacturer of the reaping machine and other agricultural equipment. Also included is Charles Goodyear (1800-1860), the innovator who created the vulcanization process that made rubber useful. Samuel Colt (1814-1862), the gun inventor and manufacturer is present, as is Peter Cooper (1791-1883) the builder of the first American steam locomotive. Samuel Morse (1791-1872), the innovative thinker responsible for both the electric telegraph and the Morse Code, is shown, as well as William Morton (1819-1868), the dentist who co-discovered ether’s use as an anesthetic. Nor does Schussele omit Elias Howe (1819-1867), the inventor of the sewing machine. These, as well as 12 other equally-accomplished thinkers and inventors, form the subject of Schussele’s masterpiece.

The administrators of the Cooper Union (founded by Peter Cooper in 1859) recently commissioned one of their leading graduates, the artist Edward Sorel, to paint a sequel to Schussele’s work – a portrait of twenty innovative Americans who changed the world in the 20th century. Sorel, with assistance from the editors of American Heritage and American Heritage of Invention & Technology, chose the subjects. Not surprisingly, some of the geniuses depicted started their brilliant careers in the second half of the 19th century. Anti-capitalist historians regularly refer to this era as “the Gilded Age,” and deride its great industrialists as “Robber Barons.” They claim that its extensive industrial development was achieved by means essentially tawdry and unprincipled. They are profoundly mistaken, and have failed to identify the essence of the era. It must be known as: the Inventive Period.

In Schussele’s painting, Benjamin Franklin looks down on those assembled as both inspiration and presiding genius. Sorel grants this honor to Thomas Edison. Edison (1847-1931), is the exemplar of his age. He is widely known as the inventor of the electrical lighting system, the phonograph, the electric generator and the motion picture projector. He also later coordinated movies with phonographic sound to create the world’s first multi-media presentation. But Edison is by no means alone in exemplifying the scientific/technological genius of the period. Sorel’s portrait projects numerous other great minds.

Among them are George Washington Carver (1864-1943), the brilliant black American botanist and agronomist, who developed a new type of cotton, Carver’s Hybrid. Born a slave, he is most famous for developing sweet potatoes and peanuts as leading crops, but additionally, invented hundreds of plant-based products, taught methods of soil improvement and, by means of his discoveries, induced southern farmers to grow crops other than cotton. Also included is Charles Steinmetz (1865-1923), the German immigrant who went to work for General Electric as its first director of research and development and, in the 1890s, pioneered the understanding of electrical transmission. Since Schussele’s portrait concentrates on the early 19th century, and Sorel’s on the 20th, there are many great late-19th century thinkers who are included in neither painting. Here, we can cite merely a few. One is George Eastman (1854-1932), who in 1884 patented the first film in roll form to prove practical. In 1888, he revolutionized photography by perfecting his Kodak camera, and in 1892 established the Eastman-Kodak Company, one of the first to mass produce standardized photographic equipment. Another is Cyrus W. Field (1819-1892), an entrepreneur whose interest in trans-oceanic telegraphy led, in 1866, to the completion of the trans-Atlantic cable. Field later was instrumental in laying the cable that linked the United States to Australia and Asia by way of Hawaii.

The advances in architecture wrought by William Le Baron Jenney (1832-1907) and Louis Sullivan (1856-1924) must not be overlooked. Jenney, an engineer in the Union Army during the Civil War, settled in Chicago and opened an architectural office. He pioneered the use of metal-frame construction for large buildings, which he first employed in the Home Insurance Company Building in 1885. His revolutionary method of curtain-wall construction is still used today, and has earned him the title of “father of the skyscraper.” Sullivan apprenticed with Jenney early in his career. Later, it was his designs for steel-frame buildings that resulted in the establishment of the skyscraper as a distinctively American type of building.

The innovations of George Westinghouse (1846-1914) deserve mention. Westinghouse introduced numerous inventions in various fields, but concentrated on the railroad industry. Before the age of 20, he created the “railroad frog,” an invention that permitted trains to switch tracks. His most famous advance was the air brake, invented around 1866, which became a standard feature on all trains. Westinghouse developed hundreds of innovations, acquired more than 400 patents and, together with the Croatian immigrant Nikola Tesla (1856-1943), pioneered the use of alternating current power in the United States. Tesla invented the AC induction generator in the 1880s, the first practical motor powered by alternating current. He sold the patent to Westinghouse, who put it to commercial use in the Niagara Falls power project. Westinghouse and Tesla demonstrated that alternating current was able to generate electrical power over great distances more economically than the direct current favored by Edison. Further, John Roebling (1806-1869), a German immigrant, pioneered the construction of suspension bridges in the U.S. in the second half of the 19th century. Roebling demonstrated the practicality of using steel cables in bridge construction – and today, early in the 21st century, several of his bridges still stand, including the famed Brooklyn Bridge in New York, constructed in the 1870s. Another great creator, largely forgotten today, is the U.S. Army surgeon and bacteriologist, Walter Reed (1851-1902). In the 1890s, Dr. Reed’s investigations contributed greatly to the understanding of typhoid fever, leading to the ability to prevent and control epidemics of the disease. In 1900, Reed demonstrated that the yellow fever germ was transmitted by the bite of the mosquito, Aedes aegypti. By exterminating the mosquitoes, the disease was virtually wiped out. A great thinker from the Inventive Period who is widely remembered is the Scottish immigrant, Alexander Graham Bell (1847-1922). In 1874, his work on the multiple telegraph gave him the idea for the telephone. Experiments with his research assistant, Thomas Watson, proved successful on March 10th, 1876. Later that year, Bell demonstrated the telephone at the Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia, an event leading to the organization of the Bell Telephone Company in 1877. Bell’s other inventions include the audiometer, a device for measuring hearing acuity and, later in life, the aileron and other aeronautical advances.

Space does not permit even the mention of all the inventors, entrepreneurs and groundbreaking industrialists who flourished during the period. The achievements of Frank Julian Sprague, for example, are no longer remembered. But Sprague, a brilliant electrical engineer who graduated from Annapolis and worked for Edison, electrified Richmond’s trolley system in 1888. He demonstrated that electricity was cheap, and that it could be used on both surface and elevated cars. In 1890, about 15 percent of America’s urban transit mileage was electrified; by 1902, 97 per cent.

On the eve of the 20th century, America’s technological advances were only beginning. On the morning of June 4th, 1896, Henry Ford (1863-1947) battered down the brick wall of his rented garage with an axe, and drove out his first car. Others, of course, had already built and run cars, but Ford began the Ford Motor Company in 1903 and made the automobile a commercial reality. Soon millions of Americans were driving cars. That same year of 1903, Wilbur (1867-1912) and Orville (1871-1948) Wright, two bicycle mechanics from Dayton, Ohio, who were self-educated regarding the principles of aeronautical engineering, accomplished the first controlled, powered flight of a heavier-than-air vehicle at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. Throughout the 1890s, the Wrights had been studying aeronautics and experimenting with flying devices. Both the automotive and aviation ages dawned in early 20th century America as a direct outgrowth of the achievements of the late 19th.

What underlying factor was responsible for this unprecedented outpouring of innovations, inventions, advances and new products? The answer should be obvious, but unfortunately, to many historians is not. It was the political/economic freedom of the capitalist system that enabled these inventors/entrepreneurs to flourish.

The period extending from the Emancipation Proclamation, ending slavery in 1863, to the proliferation of trustbusting and government controls in the early 20th century was the freest period of American history. The leading economists, professors, legal minds and judges upheld the principles of individual rights, limited government, economic freedom and profit making. Economists such as Amasa Walker, Arthur Latham Perry and Francis Bowen were the authors of the leading economics textbooks of the day. Their works – Science of Wealth, Elements of Political Economy and American Political Economy respectively – championed the ability of the free market to create wealth and upward economic mobility.1 Further, William Graham Sumner, the leading American social scientist of the late 19th century, wrote of “the Forgotten Man,” the honest laborer who supported himself by productive work. The principle of the Forgotten Man is that he needs the liberty of the American system if he is to flourish. He is the one always victimized by the socialists’ schemes to redistribute the income earned by private individuals.2

The law writers and legal philosophers of the day shared the same commitment to limited government. The most prominent, Thomas Cooley and Christopher Tiedeman, wrote their major works in the second half of the 19th century. The upshot of both Cooley’s A Treatise on the Constitutional Limitations Which Rest Upon the Legislative Powers of the American Union (1868) and Tiedeman’s A Treatise on the Limitations of the Police Powers of the States (1886) was the defense of property rights.3 In practice, most American judges of the period agreed with the individualistic principles of the country’s leading legal philosophers. After the Civil War, American courts generally presumed to be unconstitutional any laws restricting property rights and the rights of both businessmen and workers to set the terms of labor that they deemed best. As one example, the New York State Court of Appeals in 1885 struck down legislation seeking to limit the hours of industrial employment, ruling that such a law violated the rights of both worker and employer to engage in a voluntary transaction. Additionally, the American courts of the late 19th century repeatedly placed severe limitations on the government’s power to tax and to subsidize business ventures. The courts generally gave strong support to the capitalist principle that productive enterprise was to be privately funded, owned and operated. One representative ruling by the State court of Missouri in 1898 found against governmental paternalism, whether State or Federal, and proclaimed that individuals know best how to conduct their own business and personal affairs.4

In this era, the United States Supreme Court gradually came to be the great defender of an individual’s right to property, freedom of contract and economic liberty. Stephen Field, for example, for many years a distinguished Justice of the high court, ruled in dissenting opinions regarding such famous disputes as the Slaughter-House cases (1873) and Munn v. Illinois (1877) that the government could prevent neither employers nor workers from entering fields of their own choosing; nor could it violate the right of individuals to the full use and disposal of their property. The majority opinion, at this time, was that the Fourteenth Amendment protected the rights of the recently-freed slaves only; and that there was nothing in it to prevent the states from interfering in business activities. But by the mid-1880s, after the San Mateo case (1882) and the Santa Clara case (1886), Justice Field prevailed. Chief Justice Waite, in an oral statement only, spoke for a unanimous bench in 1886, proclaiming that all of the justices “understood and accepted the fact that corporations were persons within the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” The right of individuals to work, and to use their own labor and property as they saw fit, now came under the legal protection of the Supreme Court.5 Religious leaders of the period characteristically upheld the virtues of work, frugality, sobriety and wealth earned through honest effort. The weekly religious periodical, The Independent, edited for awhile by the noted Congregationalist minister, Henry Ward Beecher, defended the free market as the means by which both capitalists and workers would achieve material gain. Beecher, for almost four decades, preached from his influential Brooklyn pulpit the ability of hard working individuals to economically rise in the capitalist system.6

The intellectual, cultural and political climate of the country upheld freedom, limited government and property rights in this era. The economic results are not surprising. The most innovative and creative minds were then free to develop new products and methods, to start their own companies, to bring their innovations to the marketplace, to convince the customers that the new products were superior to the old and, in time, to earn a fortune. There were few governmental bureaucrats and regulators to prohibit their activities, restrict their output, dictate working conditions or limit their market share. “The first condition of this proliferation was that the innovations did not require the assent of governmental…authorities.”7 Most of the innovators of the Inventive Period were entrepreneurs who sought and made wealth by virtue of their creative work. Thomas Edison retired with a net worth of 12 million dollars, an enormous sum of money in those days. Edison’s inventions were profit-driven. “Edison’s Menlo Park laboratory was conceived to bring scientific knowledge to bear on industrial innovation…Its inventions were goals chosen with a careful eye to their marketability.”8

Such instances were numerous during the Inventive Period. George Eastman of Eastman-Kodak, George Westinghouse of the Westinghouse Electric Company and Henry Ford of the Ford Motor Company are all examples of innovators/entrepreneurs who developed their new products into profitable business ventures. Additionally, Willis Carrier (1876-1950) invented the air conditioner in 1902, held more than 80 patents by the 1940s and founded the manufacturing firm that bears his name. Alexander Graham Bell’s most famous invention led, of course, to the founding of the Bell Telephone Company. John Roebling made a fortune from his wire-manufacturing company, as did Cyrus McCormick from his firm producing the reaping machine and other farm equipment. Samuel Colt was an entrepreneur who opened his own plant, the Colt Patent Arms in 1855. He pioneered advanced manufacturing methods such as the production line and the use of interchangeable parts – and his company became the largest private armory in the world. Isaac Singer (1811-1875) wanted a commercially practical sewing machine, and brought together several related patents to create his immensely popular version. By 1860, he was the largest manufacturer of sewing machines in the world. A business innovator, Singer began such practices as installment buying, advertising campaigns and service with sales.

Further, because of the climate of political/economic freedom during the Inventive Period, America’s entrepreneurs were able to revolutionize the fields of heavy industry upon which general prosperity depended. Between 1860 and 1900, American output of bituminous coal increased by 2,260%, crude petroleum by 9,060%, steel by 10,190% and other industries increased by similar amounts.9 Industrialists such as Andrew Carnegie (1835-1919) and John D. Rockefeller (1839-1937) built Carnegie Steel and Standard Oil into enormously productive concerns that flooded the country with steel and oil products. In the 1880s and 1890s, the great railroad man, James J. Hill (1838-1916) constructed the Great Northern Railroad on private funds without government assistance and to the immense economic betterment of the northern plains and northwest states. It goes without saying that Carnegie, Rockefeller and Hill earned great wealth.

The lesson of the Inventive Period can be applied today. Political/economic freedom will lead to widespread innovation. This principle can already be seen in the computer industry, in which the relative absence of governmental regulation has enabled such innovators as Steve Jobs, Stephen Wozniak, Bill Gates, Michael Dell and others to create an information revolution and to earn wealth in the process. To defend freedom against the distortions of the anti-capitalist historians it is important to reject for the late 19th century period of American history the inaccurate and opprobrious title of “the Gilded Age.” We must recognize and celebrate the true nature of the era. It was the Inventive Period.

1. Louis M. Hacker, The World of Andrew Carnegie, 1865-1901 (New York: J.B. Lippincott, 1968), pp. 68-73. 2. Ibid., pp. 81-85. 3. Ibid., pp. 86-92. 4. Ibid., pp. 95-96. 5. Ibid., pp. 98-107. 6. Ibid., pp. 74-80. 7. Nathan Rosenberg and L.E. Birdzell, How the West Grew Rich (Basic Books, 1986), p.265. 8. Ibid., p. 250. 9. Hacker, op. cit., p. xxxi.